This is not advice. It is a record of how I think about the problems that arrive on my desk.
If something here is relevant to a situation you are dealing with, I am available for a conversation.
The instinct after a closure notice is to call a lawyer. In most cases, the problem is not legal. It is architectural — and it was visible in the structure long before the letter arrived.
A bank reviews documents. But what it is actually assessing is whether those documents tell a coherent story. The narrative is not a marketing exercise. It is an architectural one.
De-risking is not a finding that a business has done something wrong. It is a commercial decision by a bank operating under regulatory pressure, applied at the category level, with no implication about the specific conduct of the client caught within it.
Electronic money institutions are not banks. The distinction is not regulatory pedantry — it changes the structure of risk, the options available during a crisis, and the way the rest of the group reads to anyone conducting due diligence.
Cryptocurrency carries real structural risk. Not from volatility or regulation — but from the permanent public record of every transaction, the misunderstood nature of stablecoins, and the architectural failures that make operational security impossible to retrofit.
Even modest cryptocurrency activity can change the entire character of a banking relationship. Not because of what the business does — but because of how the structure reads.
The instinct is to keep everything together for simplicity. The result is that a single crypto wallet contaminates an entire corporate group in the eyes of every bank and every investor the group will ever approach.
A client asked me once what he had done wrong. I could not answer that question. Because he had not done anything wrong. His cryptocurrency was clean by every standard available to him — and six months later a bank declined to convert his holdings because of a sanctions connection three transactions back in the chain.
The problems that derail due diligence are almost never legal. They are structural. And by the time the process has begun, the options for addressing them have narrowed considerably.
A holding company without genuine economic substance is no longer a neutral element in a structure. In the current environment, it is a liability — to banking relationships, to due diligence, and to the tax position it was designed to protect.
Substance requirements are widely misunderstood. The response is usually to add a registered address, a local director, and a filing. None of that is what banks or tax authorities are actually looking for.
Structures accumulate. What began as a clean architecture develops layers — each addition logical at the time, each one making the whole harder to explain. The moment it becomes unreadable is rarely obvious from the inside.
Governance in an owner-led group is not about boards and committees. It is about making the decision-making logic of the business visible to people who were not in the room when the decisions were made.
Most businesses that encounter banking problems due to sanctions have not violated anything. They have been caught in a category — by jurisdiction, by counterparty, or by the way their structure reads to a compliance officer who has never met them.
Complexity in a corporate structure is almost never designed. It accumulates — one layer at a time, each addition solving an immediate problem while making the whole less readable, less defensible, and less useful.
I did not come to this work. I was pushed into it by a client with a problem I did not know how to solve. Everything that followed came from that.
The first conversation is not a pitch. It is a diagnostic. I am trying to understand the real situation, what has already been tried, and whether the problem is one I can actually help with.
Thinking Globally Consulting Limited
Registered in England & Wales · Company No. 17138834
128 City Road, London EC1V 2NX, United Kingdom
© 2026 Thinking Globally Consulting Limited · All rights reserved